Flaws in hosing down the Aboriginal burn-off theory

Marina Kameny Australian Geographic 10th December 2010

Traditional theory suggests that Australian Aborigines have regularly burned-off the bush as a method to manage the landscape over the last 50,000 years. But an analysis of fossilised charcoal now contests that idea.

The new research suggests that Australia's bushfire history can be explained by climate change and natural fire patterns, and that fires didn't increase when Aboriginal people first arrived about 50,000 years ago.

"The [European settlers] made these grand assumptions about the Aborigines... which now we can see weren't true," says Dr Scott Mooney, a palaeontologist from the University of New South Wales.

European influence

Burn-offs or small, cool fires were thought to be used by Aboriginal people both for hunting and for the prevention of larger fires. They raze grass and other fuels, ideally eliminating the chances of a larger fire igniting. Early European settler records show that Aboriginal mobs were familiar with fire. They wrote about patches of smoke regularly appearing in the distance in certain times of the year.

Scott's team examined and dated ancient swamp samples from 223 sites in Australia, Papua New Guinea, Indonesia and New Zealand, to determine the amount of charcoal present. The results hinted that bushfires raged through Australia 70,000 - 28,000 years ago, then decreased until 18,000 years ago, at the height of the last ice age. About 200 years ago they dramatically increased again, coinciding with European settlement.

The findings, published in the latest Quaternery Science Reviews, suggest that Australia's fire history was more consistent with global fire and climate change than Aboriginal influence. "Fires are linked to environmental trends not to the activities of Aboriginals," Scott says.

Doubts

However, Dr Scott Heckbert an environmental economist with CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences in Darwin argues that charcoal records may not be the best way to study historical burnoffs as the smaller spot fires lit by Aborigines might not always result in much charcoal. He adds that most Australian plants wouldn't be distributed around the country the way that they are now if people hadn't burned-off the land through history.

Dr Gavin Prideaux, a palaeontologist from the Flinders University in Adelaide, also believes the new study placed too much emphasis on charcoal records: "It's an important piece of evidence, but it's not the only piece of evidence."

Isotope records (variation in the different weights of chemicals that reveal key information) about an animal's diet can also be useful evidence for fire history, he adds. "Isotope records from fossilised eggs belonging to the Genyornis [the extinct giant thunderbird] show that something changed in their diet that led to extinction 50,000 years ago. The change of diet happened to coincide with humans coming to Australia," says Gavin. "Fire currently seems to be the most plausible explanation for the shift in vegetation."

Moreover, there are other explanations for the increase in charcoal after European settlement, such as the relocation of Aboriginal people to settlements and urban areas, Gavin adds. "The devastating bushfires from the last two centuries took place because Aborigines lost access to their landscape. They were no longer starting these smaller fires."

Aboriginal hunting and burning increase Australia's desert biodiversity
Stanford researchers: R. Bliege Bird, D. W. Bird, B. F. Codding, C. H. Parker, and J. H. Jones
View Relevant Page View Article | Download PDF The 'Fire Stick Farming' Hypothesis (pdf)

Indigenous experience can help with climate action

"Our experts have thousands of years of data, knowledge and practice relating to the diverse landscapes that span the country: sea country, river country, desert country, rainforest, bush and island country. Our peoples' understandings of species variation, the seasons and natural events in this place stretches back far beyond the importation with white settlement of four distinct seasons and rabbits . . . " View Relevant PageView Article

Comments

In the Northern Territory

Indigenous burn control a myth: study by Michael Vincent. ABC Online
Reprinted in Tasmanian Times

Comment by Russell Langfield on 07/12/10

In the Northern Territory indigenous Australians still use fire to “clean up” the country. it is NOT a myth, but it has never been used in a way that causes damage or becomes a wildfire. When did you ever here of a bushfire in the NT?

It is done with an intimate knowledge of the land and where it’s going to burn to, in a patchwork of small low intensity fires at the right time of the year in the right conditions. And it is done to regenerate grasses and other vegetation which benefits animals as well. If it wasn’t methodically carried out by Indigenous Australians up north, it would happen naturally with lightning strikes.

Horses for courses.

Comment viewing options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.